Storytel x Trustworthy AI

Storytel

A Master’s thesis exploring how EU Trustworthy AI ethics can be translated into practical UX design guidance. Conducted in collaboration with Storytel.

ROLE

UX Researcher & Designer

TIMELINE

Spring 2026

CONTEXT

Master’s Thesis, Umeå University

AI is everywhere in consumer products, but the ethical guidelines are written for engineers, not designers...

Black box AI

AI systems feel like black boxes to users

Ethics frameworks

Ethics frameworks remain abstract and hard to act on

Gap between ethics and design

No bridge exists between policy and interface-level design decisions

THE RESEARCH QUESTION

How can user-centered design principles for trustworthy AI systems be developed and formalized to guide practical UX implementation?

THE APPROACH

Five semi-structured interviews with Storytel employees were analyzed using Grounded Theory, producing 224 codes across 35 subcategories. These were mapped against Nielsen’s ten usability heuristics and ultimately yielding five UX/AI design principles, a formal OWL ontology, and five high-fidelity Figma prototypes evaluated by 97 Storytel users.

THE PROCESS

01

Qualitative Interviews

Five semi-structured interviews with Storytel employees exploring AI transparency, control and trust.

02

Grounded Theory Analysis

224 codes, 35 subcategories and 8 top-level categories coded iteratively with Transparency and Technical Robustness emerging as the most valued dimensions.

03

Ontology in Protégé

The taxonomy was formalized as an OWL ontology in Protégé, making the relationships between Trustworthy AI dimensions and UX heuristics explicit and queryable by machine.

04

Prototypes & Survey

Five Figma prototypes built in Storytel’s design system, evaluated through a survey with 97 users.

THE FIVE UX/AI DESIGN PRINCIPLES

UX/AI 1

AI Transparency as a Relational Foundation

Based on Nielsen H1 — Visibility of System Status

AI systems should make their identity, reasoning and data practices visible to users. Not only when something goes wrong, but as a continuous foundation for trust.

UX/AI 2

Progressive Engagement

Based on Nielsen H7 — Flexibility and Efficiency of Use

AI interfaces should offer a low-effort default experience while making deeper personalization and interaction modes accessible on demand.

UX/AI 3

Personal Context over System Categories

Based on Nielsen H2 — Match Between System and Real World

AI recommendation interfaces should surface the user's own listening behavior as visible reference points, using personal context rather than broad system-generated categories.

UX/AI 4

Reclaiming Agency from AI

Based on Nielsen H3 — User Control and Freedom

AI interfaces should provide visible and low-effort controls that allow users to reclaim agency. Whether by resetting AI memory, overriding recommendations, or switching to manual discovery.

UX/AI 5

Contextual and On-demand Transparency

Based on Nielsen H10 — Help and Documentation

AI-related information should be designed as a secondary layer, accessible through contextual triggers such as expandable sections and in-context buttons placed at the exact point where the user encounters uncertainty.

THE PROTOTYPES

Each principle was implemented as a high-fidelity Figma prototype within Storytel’s existing design system, then evaluated by 97 real users.

Prototype 1
Prototype 2
Prototype 3
Prototype 4LIVE IN THE APP
Prototype 5
Prototype 6

OUTCOME

The study produced a grounded taxonomy of 224 codes, five empirically-derived UX/AI design principles, a formal OWL ontology, and five prototypes. All validated by Storytel users.

All survey scores fell above the neutral midpoint, suggesting the principles are grounded in real user needs while pointing toward future iteration and broader domain testing.

The fourth prototype has since been implemented and is now live in the Storytel app, reaching more than 2.7 million users.

Want to go deeper? The full thesis is available to read.

READ THE THESIS →